@emacsen I'm over 35 and I think it's outdated. We're beyond the phase of having our culture shaped by libertarian sci-fi authors. Look where that took us: billionaire nerds looking at sci-fi dystopias and going "yeah! that's the world I want to build! The tech is so cool — hey, as long as I'm the one in control of the panopticon it's all good right?"
I understand that viewpoint, but as someone who uses grok a great deal, and who used it even before reading SIASL, I disagree.
Words go beyond their original usage. Many words in English have their origin with Shakespere but we don't say "Oh that's just from that English author."- they're just words we use.
And shared stories especially, those are really the center of culture.
As for dystopian and panopticon, etc. I genuinely don't know what it is you mean here. Maybe elaborate?
I think the comparison with Shakespeare doesn't work as well because "grok" is *new* enough to have been introduced in living memory while Shakespeare's words have had scores of generations to spread. it takes time to separate a word from its origin, and IMO that time is still in the future.
Oh Heinlein is a complete [pejorative] but it's also used heavily in one of my favorite books, the Illuminitus! Trillogy, alongside other words that we don't see as often today.
The "culture vs author" debate is one in which I think there's a constant debate. For example, continuing with the Shakespere example, I'd be 1000% in favor of canceling Shakespere.
Yet do we see people doing so?
I chose people <35 because SIASL is >60 years old now, and that's 2 generations.
when I hear someone use it, it makes me think they probably aren't repulsed by Heinlein, because I assume (unlike Shakespeare's words), people are much more likely to know where it came from.
I encountered the word first in Unix forums in the 1990s, then when reading The Illumintus Trillogy!, and other scattered places in 1960s sci-fi.
Yes, I did read Stranger years later, but by then it was more of a "This is the origin of a word I already use regularly".
I can understand if I *only* saw it one source that I'd feel differently. I just... didn't.
The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!