In the sci-fi book Child of Fortune, young adults are sent off on an adventure, during which they change new name (a "freenom"). Some even change names once or twice before settling on a final one.
Trans people change names to find a name that aligns with their gender. I've also seen trans folks change names more than once.
I'm wondering if having a Freenom should be the norm for everyone or if doing so is co-opting something that is a necessity for trans folks and is special for them?
I know everyone has the ability to do a name change, but it can be complex and expensive.
When we got married, it was actually very easy- part of our form was a checkbox about changing names,
I wonder if it couldn't just be that easy for everyone, and if we shouldn't have it as part of our culture.
Trans people already have this preferred name/deadname framework, but I realize that maybe suggesting this is somehow co-opting something that trans people go through out of necessity...
I think that people should be able to change their own names if they like, easily, but I don't want to be insensitive to the fact that the reason trans people do it is because it's a necessity, not because it's a means of self-expression, but because it's a need as being seen as their gender.
I worry that the idea is somehow insensitive- that's why I asked!
I'm sorry but I don't understand at all.
How can a standard legal procedure be insensitive to a group that happily uses that procedure?
I mean even if it was, what would give any group ownership over someone's name or at least the exclusive right to deny people the choice of their name?
The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!