There's a lot that's nice here. It's short, it gets to the point and addresses a lot of concerns.
One that that stood out was about enforcement. It says operators *must* remain confidential about reporters.This is a good default stance but it also precludes the possibility of restorative justice or any other reconsiliation process.
Those may not always be applicable but should be be possible and encouraged when both sides are open to the process.
@moodlenet I'd like to suggest an alternative wording or procedure, which would be to ask the reporter if they're okay with being named, and or if they'd be open to some kind of process.
It's more work for operators, but it empowers reporters and makes the possibility for a better world.
I suggest that people be given an option when they report, and if not then, later. That does put more work on operators though (and no one should be obligated to do this work), but it may make things better in the world.
My concern is that for some people, we're losing the opportunity to bring them over to our side if we just showed some compassion.
This is why I *dislike* Mastodon's new federated block system, as it hands off the block to the other instance, telling them someone's been blocked.
I think that these things should be confidential by default, but an option kept for some kind of external process, if both parties are amenable to it.
The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!